Compare
Where Exploit Hound fits.
A capability table across five exposure management platforms, each cell taken from that vendor’s own published documentation. Exploit Hound loses several of these rows outright, and they are left in.
Oldest check in this comparison: 12 September 2026. Every cell comes from each vendor's own product documentation, page by page, and each one carries the page it came from and the date that page was read. Vendor capabilities and packaging change frequently; verify anything that would decide a purchase directly with them.
How Exploit Hound is delivered
Stated separately from the comparison below, and only about us: this is a fact about our own architecture, and we do not publish claims about how other vendors deliver theirs without a source.
| Capability | Exploit Hound |
|---|---|
| Hosted management platform | ✓ |
| Onsite probe / collector | ✓ |
| OS endpoint clients / agents | ✓ Linux, Windows and macOS Beta |
| Customer-hosted management platform | ✗ |
Capability comparison
Both columns use one vocabulary of eight statuses, defined under the table. The Exploit Hound column is generated from the same registry the integrations page reads, so it cannot say something different here.
| Capability | Exploit Hound | ConnectSecure | Tenable One | CrowdStrike Falcon | Rapid7 Exposure Command | Qualys VMDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSP multi-tenancy | Available | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Internal network assessment | Available | Not verified | Available | Available | Available | Not verified |
| External attack surface | Available | Available | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Endpoint agent | Limited scope Linux, Windows and macOS Beta | Not verified | Available | Available | Available | Not verified |
| Active Directory assessment | Beta no live directory assessed | Available | Available | Separate module | Not verified | Not verified |
| Entra ID / M365 assessment | Beta Graph payload mapping unproven | Available | Available | Separate module | Not verified | Not verified |
| Google Workspace assessment | Beta built 18 August 2026 | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| EPSS prioritization | Available | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| CISA KEV weighting | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Web application checks | Beta basic checks, not a DAST product | Plan dependent | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Full dynamic application security testing | Not available | Not verified | Available | Not verified | Plan dependent | Not verified |
| Sensitive data discovery | Beta Runs on the OS client over paths an operator configures, and is off until they do. Reports where suspected sensitive… | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Native OS and application patching | Not available | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Separate module |
| Compliance frameworks | Limited scope six frameworks | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Available | Not verified |
| Exposure graph | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Attack path analysis | Available | Not verified | Available | Available | Available | Not verified |
| Choke point ranking of remediation | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| NetFlow telemetry | Available NetFlow | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Honeypot / deception | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| PSA ticketing integration | Beta HaloPSA, ConnectWise, Autotask, Jira, ServiceNow | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| ITSM ticketing integration | Beta HaloPSA, ConnectWise, Autotask, Jira, ServiceNow | Not verified | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| RMM remediation orchestration | Beta NinjaOne, Datto, Syncro, N-able | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Remediation verified by re-checking | Available | Not verified | Available | Not verified | Available | Not verified |
| Cloud posture assessment | Beta never run against a live account | Plan dependent | Available | Not verified | Plan dependent | Not verified |
| Container and Kubernetes security | Not available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Plan dependent | Not verified |
| OT and IoT coverage | Not available | Not verified | Available | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
| Published price list | Available on the pricing page | Limited scope | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified | Not verified |
How to read this table
Our column is generated from the capability registry the whole site reads, so it says the same thing here as on the integrations page. Each vendor column links to that vendor’s own comparison, where every cell names the product, the official page it came from and the date that page was read.
- Available
- Documented by the vendor as part of the named product, with no separate module or tier stated on the page checked.
- Pending approval
- Built, and validated against a live environment, with operator approval for general availability still outstanding. Usable under the terms of a guided evaluation; not yet generally available.
- Separate module
- Documented, and sold or packaged as a different named product from the one this column is about.
- Plan dependent
- Documented as belonging to a higher tier, package or add-on of the same product.
- Beta
- Implemented and available for guided evaluation; production validation is not complete.
- Limited scope
- Present, and narrower than the row's name suggests. The note says how.
- Not available
- The vendor's own documentation states it is not supported, or we have established the product does not do it.
- Not verified
- We have not checked an official source for this row. It is not a claim that the capability is missing.
Not verified is not Not available. Most of the Qualys column is unresearched rather than missing, and it says so.
How these statuses relate to the ones on the integrations page
Exploit Hound integration statuses are generated from the same shared registry used by the integrations page. This keeps GA, Production Validation, Beta and Not Built classifications consistent throughout the website. The registry’s own words for what those classifications mean, and how each is drawn here:
- Available
- GA — Validated end to end in a live deployment and approved for production use.
- Pending approval
- Production Validation — Live validation has been completed, with final approval still pending. It is not generally available, and this table does not show it as though it were.
- Beta
- Beta — Implemented and tested, including against recorded provider behavior, but not yet validated against a live vendor tenant.
- Limited scope
- Partial — built, and narrower in scope than the name implies. The cell says how.
- Not available
- Not Built — not implemented and not represented as available. We can say this about our own product; we almost never say it about somebody else’s.
Compared with ConnectSecure Compared with CrowdStrike Compared with Tenable Compared with Rapid7 Compared with Qualys
Capabilities we have not compared
Exploit Hound does these. We have deliberately left them out of the table above rather than fill six columns with —, which would tell you nothing while looking like a comparison.
See what we scan and how for what each of these rests on, or the product tour for what they look like in the console.
How to compare these properly
Ask every vendor the same questions against your own scope: how many technician hours per customer per month, what a prioritized remediation list looks like for your estate, and whether the tool can show you why it ranked something first. Ask for that against real data rather than a canned demo. We will do the same, including where the answer favours another vendor.
Start with what's actually exposed.
Point Exploit Hound at the assets you are authorized to assess and see the connected picture, ranked by what removes the most exposure.