Solutions
Same evidence. Different job to be done.
Exploit Hound is built around one correlated model of exposure. What changes between teams is which question you start from.
MSPs
Many customers, finite hours
Start from the customer list, ranked by attention required, and work down. Fix First tells you what to do inside each customer; the change view tells you what to say at the next review.
Internal IT
One network, no security team
You do not need a specialist to read a ranked list of actions where each one says what it removes and why it was recommended.
Start with the top item
The highest-ranked action is the one that removes the most exposure. Do that, then verify it.
Know your critical systems
Mark domain controllers, hypervisors and backup infrastructure as critical, and prioritization follows.
Prove progress
Verified fixes and eliminated attack paths give you something concrete to report upward.
Security teams
Prioritization you can defend
Every score is a sum of named factors with the evidence attached, so a priority decision survives being questioned.
Explainable by construction
No black-box number. Each factor states its contribution and its source.
Careful language
Detected, high confidence and safely validated mean specific things, and nothing is called exploited without evidence.
Full history
Findings are never deleted for falling out of a scan; every transition is auditable.
Start with what's actually exposed.
Point Exploit Hound at the assets you are authorized to assess and see the connected picture — not another list.