Built for MSPs
See risk across every customer from one console.
Identify which organizations need immediate attention, prioritize the exposures that matter most, track remediation SLAs and deliver reports that demonstrate measurable security improvement.
The Monday morning view
One screen, every customer you are assigned to, ranked by attention required rather than alphabetically.
Ranked triage
Immediate attention, critical, high, moderate or healthy — derived from exposure score, known exploited vulnerabilities, routes to critical assets and SLA state.
What actually matters
Critical findings, Internet-exposed criticals, attack paths to critical assets, unauthorised devices, honeypot activity and suspicious network flows, per customer.
Delivery health
Agent health, scan health, SLA violations and overdue remediation, so a coverage gap is visible before a customer finds it.
Isolation you can put in a contract
Tenant separation in Exploit Hound is structural, not cosmetic.
Enforced in the data model
Every asset, finding, graph node, graph relationship and attack path carries its tenant. A relationship whose two endpoints belong to different tenants is refused at the service layer — cross-tenant correlation is not something an API caller can request.
Enforced at the API
A user bound to a tenant is pinned to it. A request naming a different tenant is rejected rather than silently ignored, and a record belonging to another tenant returns "not found" rather than confirming it exists.
Reporting
Technicians need actions. Clients need proof.
The same evidence, written twice, because the two audiences are answering different questions and a single report serves neither well.
Technician view
- What is exposed, on which asset, and since when
- Why it ranks where it does — every factor named, with its contribution
- Which single action closes the most of it
- What the fix is, and what to check afterwards
- Whether the last fix was verified, and by what method
Customer and executive view
- Exposure score, and which way it moved over the period
- Critical exposures, in plain language
- Remediation progress against SLA
- Attack paths removed, and to which systems
- Verified fixes, separated from fixes merely reported
The score trend is measured rather than asserted: it comes from stored daily measurements of the same number, and where two measurements do not yet exist the report says so instead of drawing a line. How verification works →
Proof
See it on your own estate
The most honest proof is your own estate. A guided evaluation runs Exploit Hound against a scope you choose and authorize, and shows you the real result.
You see it on your own environment: what the first assessment finds, the attack paths it connects, which single fixes remove the most exposure, and whether a fix held when the platform re-checked it. Your numbers, not a claim about someone else’s.
Conversations that go somewhere
"What changed?" is a first-class view: added, removed, worsened and improved over 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days or a period you choose.
New exposure
New assets, new services, new findings, new routes to critical systems.
Regressions
Findings that came back after being verified, and remediation that slipped past SLA.
Wins
Verified fixes and eliminated attack paths, with dates you can quote.
Unauthorised devices
Devices that appeared on a customer network without being authorized.
Start with what's actually exposed.
Point Exploit Hound at the assets you are authorized to assess and see the connected picture, ranked by what removes the most exposure.